Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Identification of relevant features using SEQENS to improve supervised machine learning models predicting AML treatment outcome

Original Submission
20 Mar 2024 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 Sep 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Sep 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
21 Sep 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Oct 2024 Author responded Author comments - Pedro Pons-Suñer
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Oct 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Oct 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
24 Oct 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Oct 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Nov 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Nov 2024 Author responded Author comments - Pedro Pons-Suñer
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Nov 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Nov 2024 Author responded Author comments - Pedro Pons-Suñer
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Nov 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Nov 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 Jan 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 Mar 2025 Author responded Author comments - Pedro Pons-Suñer
Resubmission - Version 6
10 Mar 2025 Submitted Manuscript version 6
16 Mar 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
10 Apr 2025 Editorially accepted
1 May 2025 Article published 10.1186/s12911-025-03001-y

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page