Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Design and evaluation of an electronic follow-up questionnaire for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

Original Submission
23 Oct 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Oct 2023 Author responded Author comments - Parissa Bagheri Toolaroud
12 Jan 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Jan 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
29 Mar 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
22 Apr 2024 Author responded Author comments - Parissa Bagheri Toolaroud
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Oct 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Apr 2024 Author responded Author comments - Parissa Bagheri Toolaroud
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Apr 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 May 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yuanda Zhu
26 May 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
29 May 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emma Safstrom
17 Jul 2024 Author responded Author comments - Parissa Bagheri Toolaroud
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Jul 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Sep 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emma Safstrom
15 Jan 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report
30 Jan 2025 Author responded Author comments - Parissa Bagheri Toolaroud
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Jan 2025 Submitted Manuscript version 5
9 Feb 2025 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
11 Feb 2025 Editorially accepted
26 Feb 2025 Article published 10.1186/s12911-025-02931-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page