Category and parameter | Key findings and considerations |
---|---|
Bias | Â |
Race and ethnicity bias | Bias in AI-based medical imaging for light-skinned individuals. |
Gender bias | Health disparities for women in ethnic minority groups. |
Geographical disparities | Amplification of bias in retrospective studies. |
Clinical trial bias | Minimal representation of certain populations, which raises efficacy concerns. |
Socioeconomic bias | The undervaluation of healthcare costs for certain demographic groups, which affects algorithms. |
Algorithmic bias in various applications | Biases in algorithms used to determine kidney function and perform facial recognition. |
Federated learning as a solution | Potential accessibility issues for small institutions and corporate dominance. |
Regulations and policy | Â |
International norms | Recommendations from the WHO, the USA’s AI Bill of Rights, and the European Commission. |
Fairness and health inequities | Need for strong regulatory standards and guidelines to address potential health inequities. |
Dedication to diversity | Legislative protections for the use of AI to address rare diseases in line with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. |
Uniform legal frameworks | A lack of such frameworks, which entails compliance challenges, thus highlighting the necessity of state supervision. |
Privacy | Â |
Challenges pertaining to data transfer | The simplification of data transfer through digitalization, which nevertheless introduces challenges related to security and auditing. |
Ethical principles | Inadequate exploration of the influence of ethical principles on AI models. |
Need for AI regulations | The necessity of AI regulation in healthcare, especially with regard to unintended causal patterns. |
Inclusion | Â |
Balanced datasets | Essential for model quality and the avoidance of errors. |
Community engagement | Essential for avoiding biases; inclusivity is a moral and strategic imperative. |
Patient-centric AI | The need for AI to incorporate gender, sex, and socioeconomic factors comprehensively. |
Equity | Â |
Dual effects of AI | The fact that AI may either promote or impede health equity. |
Addressingvulnerable populations | An emphasis on the needs of vulnerable populations through equitable data management and testing methodologies. |
NLP in patient-centric care | Identification of NLP as a powerful tool for patient-centric care, which can promote equity. |
Validation | Â |
Challenges pertaining to clinical validation | Challenges that highlight the need for real-world evidence and comprehensive testing methodologies. |
Importance of empirical evidence | A regulatory emphasis on empirical evidence to support the safety, efficacy, and equity of the use of AI in healthcare. |
Nuanced model performance | The necessity of validation in diverse domains. |
Global impact | Â |
Regional disparities in adoption | The fact that developed countries exhibit advanced integration, thus leading to variations in healthcare outcomes. |
Variations in outcomes and efficacy | Geographical disparities, which result in varying outcomes and context-dependent effectiveness. |
Ethical considerations | Essential for inclusive AI deployment. |
Public perceptions | Â |
Awareness and education | The positive influence of increased awareness on perceptions, especially among individuals with diverse backgrounds. |
Trust-building measures | Transparent communication and community engagement, which contribute to the establishment of trust. |
Cultural sensitivity in AI design | A positive influence on public trust by respecting diverse norms and values. |
Community engagement | Community engagement in decision-making processes, which establishes trust. |
Ethical considerations and accountability | Public trust, which is influenced by ethical frameworks and clear accountability measures in the context of AI applications. |
Addressing bias and fairness | Efforts to enhance fairness and equity, which resonate positively with diverse populations. |
Intersectionality in trust dynamics | The recognition of intersectionality in trust dynamics, including the fact that trust is influenced by various factors such as race, gender, and socioeconomic status. |