Skip to main content

Table 2 Regression models with binary TG as response variable (TG level is based on mg/dl)

From: Association between serum hypertriglyceridemia and hematological indices: data mining approaches

 

Model A (Total)

N = 9704

Model B (Males)

N = 3885

Model C (Females)

N = 5819

Variables

OR (CI 95%)

P-value

OR (CI 95%)

P-value

OR (CI 95%)

P-value

Sex

1.27 (1.12,1.27)

 < 0.001

-

-

Age

1.04 (1.03,1.04)

 < 0.001

1.02 (1.02,1.03)

 < 0.001

1.05 (1.04,1.06)

 < 0.001

WBC

0.84 (0.79,0.84)

 < 0.001

0.71 (0.71,0.79)

 < 0.001

0.96 (0.88,1.05)

0.401

RBC

1.21 (1.02,1.21)

0.025

1.05 (1.05,1.34)

0.682

1.29 (1.02,1.62)

0.035

HCT

1.04 (1.02,1.04)

0.001

1.05 (1.05,1.09)

0.004

1.03 (1.01,1.06)

0.034

MCHC

1.06 (1.02,1.06)

0.001

1.05 (1.05,1.11)

0.058

1.07 (1.02,1.12)

0.007

NLR

1.54 (1.32,1.54)

 < 0.001

2.12 (2.12,2.69)

 < 0.001

1.28 (1.06,1.55)

0.011

RLR

0.89 (0.87,0.89)

 < 0.001

0.84 (0.84,0.87)

 < 0.001

0.93 (0.91,0.96)

 < 0.001

Ln RPR

2.90 (2.28,2.90)

 < 0.001

2.83 (2.83,4.12)

 < 0.001

3.07 (2.24,4.21)

 < 0.001

PHR

1.38 (1.33,1.38)

 < 0.001

1.39 (1.39,1.47)

 < 0.001

1.39 (1.32,1.45)

 < 0.001

Accuracy

74%

75%

70%

  1. Abbreviations: HCT Hematocrit, RLR red cell distribution width-Lymphocyte ratio, PHR Platelet- high-density lipoprotein ratio, RPR red cell distribution width-platelet ratio, WBC white blood cell, RBC red blood cell count, MCHC mean cell hemoglobin concentration, NLR neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio