Skip to main content

Table 5 Detailed comparison between the optimal proposed model and Padua

From: A new risk assessment model of venous thromboembolism by considering fuzzy population

Statistic

Padua model used in clinic

Proposed best model

Sensitivity

0.9024(0.7687, 0.9728)

0.9024(0.7687, 0.9728)

Specificity

0.6330(0.6082, 0.6572)

0.6481(0.6235, 0.6721)

Youden Index

0.5354(0.3769, 0.6300)

0.5505(0.3922,0.6448)

PPV

0.0620(0.0440, 0.0846)

0.0646(0.0459,0.0879)

NPV

0.9959(0.9895, 0.9989)

0.9960(0.9897,0.9989)

PLHR

2.4587(2.1800, 2.7731)

2.5642(2.2707,2.8956)

NLHR

0.1541(0.0607, 0.3913)

0.1505(0.0593,0.3822)

  1. PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; NLHR, negative likelihood ratio; PLHR, positive likelihood ratio