From: An improved electrocardiogram arrhythmia classification performance with feature optimization
Authors | Dataset | ECG beat/rhythm | Class | FE | FS | Classifier | Performance results (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACC | SEN | SPE | PRE | |||||||
Cai et al. [11] | MIT-BIH Arrhythmia | Beat | 5 | Time-domain | - | CNN | 91.5 | - | - | - |
13 | 75.6 | - | - | - | ||||||
Zhang et al. [53] | MIT-BIH Arrhythmia | Beat | 8 | Time–domain | - | CNN | 99.1 | - | - | - |
8 | Frequency-domain | - | CNN | 96.3 | - | - | - | |||
Wang et al. [54] | MIT-BIH Arrhythmia | Beat | 5 | Time–frequency-domain | - | CNN | 99.43 | - | - | - |
Kumar M et al. [55] | MIT-BIH Arrhythmia | Beat | 4 | Frequency-domain | - | CNN | 99.7 | 98.3 | 99.2 | 96.1 |
Proposed | LUDB and QTDB | Rhythm | 2 | Time-domain | TLO | SVM | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
4 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |