Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of studies on forecasting patient arrivals in emergency departments (n = 33)

From: Enhanced forecasting of emergency department patient arrivals using feature engineering approach and machine learning

Author (Year) / Country

EDs analyzed / Time frame

Forecast object, period and horizon

Predictors tested

Forecasting models

Most frequently retained variables

Partitioning of the dataset for training, test and validation

Performance metrics

Main Results

Chen et al. [17] (2011) / Taiwan

ED of a regional teaching hospital with intensive care beds in Kaohsiung City/ 01/2005 – 09/2009

Number of monthly general, traumatology, and pediatric arrivals over a 9-month horizon

-

ARIMA

-

Training: 01/2005 −12/2008. Test: 01/2009–09/2009

MAPE

General patients: ARIMA model with MAPEs in the interval (13.71%—41.61%) and average 19.59%

Traumatology patients: ARIMA model with MAPEs in the interval (10.16%—19.12%) and average 12.39%

Pediatric patients: ARIMA model with MAPEs in the interval (5.73%—54.24%) and average 29.08%

Boyle et al. [22] (2012)/ Austrália

EDs of 27 public hospitals mixed urban e regional in Queensland / 2005–2009

Monthly arrivals over a 12-month horizon

Calendar: day of week, month of year, holidays, and days before and after holidays

ARIMA, MLR and ES

All variables in the model MLR

Training: 01/2005- 12/2008. Test: 01/2009–12/2009

MAPE

For all 27 hospitals: MAPEs in the interval (7%—25%) and average 12.30%

Marcilio et al. [42] (2013) / Brazil

High complexity ED in the southern region of the city of São Paulo, operating 24/7 / 01/2008–12/2010

Daily and monthly arrivals over 7 and 30-day horizons

Calendar: day of week, holidays, and days before and after a holidayClimate: daily average temperature

GLM, GEE and SARIMA

All variables in the best performing models (GLM and GEE)

Training: 01/2008–09/2010 Test: 10/2010–12/2010. After forecasting 7 and 30 days in October, the values observed of October were incorporated into the training set and the models re-estimated to November forecast. This process was repeated in the month of December

MAPE

GLM and GEE with MAPEs of 4.5–9.9% over 7-day horizon, with and without temperature as predictor. GLM and GEE with MAPEs ranging of 8.7–12.8% over 30-day horizon, with and without temperature as predictor

Menke et al. [43] (2014) / Country not reported

ED of a tertiary hospital, location not disclosed / 02/2007–12/2009

Daily arrivals. Horizon not reported

Calendar: day of week and special events

Climate: weather and air quality

MLP with back propagation

All variables to estimate the MLP algorithm

There was no division between training and testing

R2

The adjusted R2 is 0.957. 95% of the time, the MLP estimated an error within 20 arrivals

Kadri et al. [44] (2014) / France

Paediatric Emergency Department of the Lille Regional Hospital Centre, operating 24/7 / 01/2012–12/2012

Total number of daily arrivals, unplanned arrivals (G2) and unexpected arrivals (G4) over 1 to 7-day horizons

-

ARMA

-

Training: 01/2012–12/2012. Test: 12/2012–12/2012

ME

Total arrivals: ME of 3.79–9.03. Unplanned arrivals (G2): ME ranged of 5.5–9.26. Unexpected arrivals (G4): ME of 31–72, over all horizons

Bergs et al. [45] (2014)/ Belgium

Four EDs of a university hospital and three regional hospitals in the Flemish region / 01/2005–12/2011

Monthly arrivals over a 12-month horizon

-

ETS

-

Training: 01/2005–12/2010

Test: 01/2011–12/2011

MAPE, MASE and MAE

MAPEs ranged of 2.63–4.76% and MASE of 0.53–0.68 in forecasting the four EDs

Calegari et al. [46] (2016) /Brazil

ED of a public, tertiary teaching hospital in the city of Porto Alegre, serving high complexity patients, operating 24/7 / 01/2013–05/2015

Total number of daily arrivals,

urgent arrivals and very urgent arrivals over horizons of 1, 7, 14, 21 and 30 days

Calendar: month of year and day of week. Climate: minimum, maximum and average temperature, amount of rain, wind speed, relative humidity and hours of insolation

SS, HW, SARIMA and MSARIMA

All calendar and climate variables in the MSARIMA models

Training: 01/2013–03/2015

Test 30-days: (i) 03/2015–04/

2015, (ii) 01/2015–02/2015 and (iii) 05/2015–05/2015. After forecasting of (i). The values observed of (i) were incorporated into the training set and the models re-estimated to forecast of (ii). This process was repeated on test set (iii)

MAPE

Total arrivals of all horizons: SS with MAPEs of 2.91%−11.35%. Urgent and very urgent arrivals of all horizons: SARIMA obtained MAPEs ranging of 3.98%−15.71% and 7.19%−17.23% respectively

Xu (2016) [18] /China

EDs from two hospitals in DaLian, LiaoNing Province. ED-A is large while ED-B is small / 01/2012–12/2013

Daily arrivals over 1 and 7-day horizons

Calendar: day of week, month of year, public holidays and school holidays, day after a holiday

Climate: maximum and minimum daily temperature

ARIMA, ARIMAX, ARIMA-LR, ARIMA-LR with smoothing, ARIMA- ANN and GLM

Group 1: temperature variables, group 2: holiday variables, and group 3: calendar variables. In ED-A, the three groups of variables were retained by the GLM, ARIMAX, ARIMA-LR and ARIMA-ANN models. In ED-B, group 2 was retained in all models

Training: 01/2012–06/2013 (547-days). Test: 07/2013–12/2013 (184-days)

MAPE and RMSE

ED-A and ED-B: ARIMA-LR obtained values of MAPEs ranging of 5.8%−13.1% and RMSEs of 5.37–136.4 over 1-day horizon. ED-A and ED-B: ARIMA-LR (smoothing) obtained MAPEs ranging of 6.1%−12.9% and RMSEs of 5.33–147 over 7-day horizon

Juang et al. (2017) [19] /Taiwan

ED of a medical center in southern Taiwan / 01/2009–12/2016

Monthly arrivals within a 12-month horizon

-

ARIMA

-

Training: 01/2009–12/2015 Test: 01/2016–12/2016

MAPE

ARIMA (0, 0, 1), obtained a MAPE of 8.91%

Hertzum (2017) [47] /Denmark

Four EDs of mid-sized hospitals in the Zealand region / 01/2012–01/2015

Hourly arrivals over 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24-h horizons

Calendar: time of day, day of week and month of year

MLR, ARIMA and Naive

The months of year, days of week, and times of day in MLR

Training: 01/2012–12/2014

Test: 01/2015–01/2015

MAPE, MASE and MAE

1-h prediction in the 4 EDs: ARIMA e MLR obtiveram MAPEs variando entre 47%−58% e MASE de 0.72–0.77. 2, 4, 8, and 24-h predictions for ED2: ARIMA and MLR with MAPEs of 41% and 37% (2-h), 34% and 34% (4-h), 21% and 26% (8-h), and 11% and 9.9% (24-h)

Carvalho-Silva et al. [23] (2018) /Portugal

ED of a public hospital in the Minho region / 01/2012–12/2014

Weekly and monthly arrivals over one-week, three-week, one-month and twelve-month horizons

-

ARIMA, HW, Multiplicative HW, Moving average and ES

-

Training: 01/2012–12/2013

Test: 01/2014–12/2014 and three weeks of 01/2014

MAPE

ARIMA: MAPEs of 5.22% and 6.34%, in weekly and monthly forecasts

Yucesan (2018) [4] / Turkey

ED of a private hospital in Trabzon / 05/2015–04/2017

Daily arrivals. Horizon not reported

Calendar: day of week, day of year and month of year

MLR, ARIMA, ANN, ES, ARIMA-ANN and ARIMA-LR

MLR and ANN models retained all calendar variables. Best performing hybrid methods did not retain variables

Training: 2016 (365-days). Didn't have the test set

MAPE

ARIMA-ANN and ARIMA-LR: MAPEs of 0.49% and 0.92% respectively

Asheim et al. [48] (2019) /Noruega

ED of St. Olav’s University Hospital, Trondheim, operating 24/7 / 01/2010–12/2018

Hourly arrivals over 1, 2 and 3-h horizons

-

Poisson regression

-

Training: 01/2010–12/2016

Validation: 01/2017–12/2017

Test: 1, 2 and 3-h

MAPE

1, 2, and 3-h forecasts: MAPEs were 57%, 43% and 36%, respectively

Jilani et al. [15] (2019) / United Kingdom

Four EDs in the UK, locations not disclosed / 01/2011–12/2015

Weekly and monthly arrivals over 4-week and 4-month horizons

-

Fuzzy Time Series (FTS), ARIMA and NN

-

Training: 01/2011–12/2015 (260 datapoints). Test: 4-weeks and 4-months

MAPE and RMSE

For all EDs: MAPEs ranged from 2.6%−4.7% using FTS in weekly forecasts and MAPEs from 2.01%−2.81% and RMSE from 57.30–167.89 in monthly forecasts

Whitt et al. [3] (2019) /Israel

ED of Rambam Hospital, Haifa, operating 24/7 / 01/2004–10/2007

Daily arrivals over 1 to 7-day horizons

Calendar: days of week, month of year and holidays. Climate: precipitation, maximum and minimum daily temperature

MLR, SARIMA, SARIMAX and MLP

The days of week, the month of year, holidays and temperatures in MLR, SARIMAX and MLP

tenfold cross validation in all datasets for MLP

MAPE and MSE

SARIMAX: 8.4% MAPE in 1-day forecast. MSE between 193–211, in forecasts of 1 to 7-days

Khaldi et al. [27] (2019) /Morocco

ED in the city of Fes, operating 24/7 / 2010–2016

Weekly arrivals over one-week week horizon

-

ANN, ARIMA EEMD-ANN and DWT-ANN

-

ARIMA used 80%/20% train/test partitions. Remaining models used training: 70%, Validation: 15%, Test: 15%

RMSE, MAE and R2

EEMD-ANN had the best performance: RMSE of 52.86 and MAE of 39.88

Zhang et al. [35] (2019) /China

Radiology ED of a large hospital in

Sichuan / 01/2013–12/2016

Daily arrivals over a 1-day horizon

Calendar: temporal factors related to annual, quarterly, monthly and weekly periodicities and the effect of holidays

ARIMA, SVR and ARIMA-SVR

Temporal factors annual, quarterly, monthly, weekly and the effect of holidays

Training: 80%

Test: 20% tenfold cross validation only in training set to determine the hyperparameters of the SVR and ARIMA-SVR methods

MAPE, RMSE, MAE and relative error (RE)

ARIMA-SVR achieved the best performance: MAPE of 7.02% and RMSE of 19.20

Choudhury and Urena [1] (2020) / USA

ED of a hospital in Des Moines, Iowa / 2014–2017

Hourly arrivals over a 30-day horizon

-

TBATS, HW, NN and ARIMA

-

Training: 01/2014–07/2017

Test: 08/2017

RMSE and ME

ARIMA had the best performance: RMSE of 1.55 and ME of 1.00

Yousefi et al. [21] (2020) /Brazil

ED of a hospital in Belo Horizonte, operating 24/7 / 01/2014–11/2016

Daily arrivals over 1 to 7-day horizons

Calendar: soccer match events, weekends, holidays, day before and after holidays

LSTM

Soccer match events, weekends, holidays

Training: 70%

Test: 30%

MAPE and R2

MAPE values from 4.89% to 6.31% (average 5.55%) and R2 values from 0.86 to 0.99 (average 0.940) over all horizons

Harrou et al. [16] (2020) / France

Paediatric ED of the CHRU-Lille Hospital, operating 24/7 / 01/2011–11/2013

Hourly and daily arrivals over a 1 to 4-h and 1-day horizons

-

RNN, LSTM, BiLSTM, ConvLSTM, RBM, CNN, GRU and VAE

-

Training: 70%

Test: 30%

RMSE, MAE, R2 and EV

VAE was the best performing model, with RMSE values from 0.41 to 2.74 and MAE values from 0.30 to 2.32 over all horizons

Rocha and Rodrigues [5] (2021) /Portugal

ED of a Portuguese hospital, location not disclosed / 01/2009–12/2018

Daily and hourly arrivals over 4 to 24-h horizons

Calendar: year, month of year, day of week, time of day and holidays

Snaive, ESD, SARIMA, AR-NN, RNN, XGBoost, RNN-1L, RNN-3L, RNN-1L–XGBoost and Ensemble model

AR-NN, RNN, XGBoost, RNN-1L, RNN-3L, RNN-1L–XGBoost and Ensemble models retained all variables

Training: 01/2009–12/2016

Validation: 01/2017–12/2017

Test: 01/2018–12/2018

RMSE, sMAPE and MAE

RNN-1L: RMSE ranging of 4.8–26 and sMAPE of 4.3%−21.3%;

RNN-3L: RMSE ranging of 4.7–26.1 and sMAPE of 4.2%−23.1%; and RNN-1L–XGBoost: RMSE ranging of 4.7–28.4 and sMAPE of 4.7%−23.2% over all horizons

Vollmer et al. [20] (2021) / England

EDs at St Mary's Hospital and Charing Cross Hospital in London, both operating 24/7 / 01/2011–12/2018

Daily arrivals over 1, 3 and 7-day horizons

Calendar: day of week, month of year, public holidays, and school holidays. Climate: precipitation, maximum and minimum temperature on previous day

ARIMA, ETS, STLM, StructTS, GLMNET, RF, GBM and KNN

ML algorithms (GLMNET, RF, GBM and KNN) retained all variables

sixfold time series cross validation in all datasets

MAPE and MAE

St Mary’s hospital: MAPEs of 6.9%−8.3% using time series models and MAPEs of 6.8%−7.4% using ML algorithms. Charing Cross Hospital: MAPEs ranging of 8.5%−12% using time series models and MAPEs from 8.6%−10.1% using ML algorithms

Erkamp et al. [6] (2021) / Netherlands

ED of Jeroen Bosch Hospital in the Hertogenbosch, operating 24/7 / 06/2016–12/2019

Daily arrivals over a horizon not reported

Calendar: day of week, month of year, summer vacation, school holidays and public holidays

Climate: wind speed, minimum, average and maximum temperatures, radiation, pressure, visibility, cloudiness, humidity and precipitation

MLR

Calendar variables, temperature maximum, radiation, pressure, visibility and humidity

Training: 06/2016–12/2018

Test: 01/2019–12/2019

MAPE

MAPEs of 8.71%, retaining only calendar predictors and 8.68%, retaining calendar and climate predictors

Sudarshan et al. (2021) [7] / Denmark

ED of a public teaching hospital in Esbjerg, operating 24/7 / 05/2015–10/2017 and 01/2019–12/2019

Daily and weekly arrivals over 1, 3, and 7-day horizons

Calendar: time of day, day of week, day of month, month of year, day of year, holidays and school holidays. Climate: temperature, wind speed, wind direction, cloud visibility, cloud cover and dew point

RF, LSTM and CNN

Day of week, day of month, month of year, day of year, holidays, temperature, wind speed, cloud visibility, cloud cover and dew point retained by all algorithms

tenfold cross validation in all datasets

MAPE and MSE

LSTM: average MAPEs of 9.31% and 8.91%, average MSEs of 193.25 and 190.46, on the three and seven-days forecasts. CNN: average MAPEs of 9.24% and 10.69%, average MSEs of 192.84 and 232.39, on the three and seven-days forecasts

Pekel et al. [39] (2021) /Turkey

ED of a public hospital in Istanbul / 01/2011–12/2012

Daily arrivals within 148 days horizon

Calendar: month of year, day of week, and holidays. Climate: maximum daily temperature

Bayesian ANN model, GA-ANN and PSO-ANN

ML algorithms (ANN, GA-ANN and PSO-ANN) retained all variables

tenfold cross validation only in training set

MAPE, RMSE, MAE, MSE and R2

PSO-ANN obtained the lowest values in all performance metrics evaluated, with MAPE of 6% and RMSE of 53.29

Harrou et al. [24] (2022) /France

Paediatric ED of the CHRU-Lille Hospital, operating 24/7 / 01/2011–12/2012

Daily arrivals of the following types: non-urgent, urgent, unexpected, biology, radiology, scanner and echography over a 150-day horizon

-

DBN, RBM, LSTM, GRU, CNN-GRU, CNN-LSTM, GAN-RNN, SVR and RR

-

Training: 80% (first 580-days of each time series)

Test: 20% (remaining 150 days). Algorithms’ hyperparameters determined through minimization of the cross-entropy error

MAPE, RMSE, R2, EV and MAE

DBN, RBM and CNN-GRU showed superior performance, with mean values of MAPEs between 4.09%−7.52% and RMSE of 0.63–0.94

Petsis [40] (2022) /Greece

ED of a general and public hospital in Ioannina, operating on odd days / 03/2013–12/2019

Daily arrivals over a 1- and 2-days horizon

Calendar: day of year, month of year, day of month, day of week and week of year. Public and local holidays, school holidays and special events. Climate: daily average, minimum and maximum temperatures, amount of rain per day and average wind speed per day

XGBoost

Algorithm retained all variables

Training: 80% (first 870-days of the time series)

Test: 20% (remaining 217-days). Algorithm trained through cross-validation

RMSE, MAPE and MAE

One-Day forecasting: RMSE of 22.96 and MAPE of 6.5%. Two-Day forecasting: RMSE of 23.9 and MAPE of 6.91%

Zhang et al. [41] (2022) /China

ED of a public hospital in Hefei / 11/2019–11/2020

Daily and hourly arrivals over a 90-day horizon

Calendar: day of week, time of day, month of year, season of year and holiday

Climate: Daily temperature (min, max and mean), mean wind speed, air quality level, precipitation, weather and variables related to the air quality index

MLR, KNN, SVR, Ridge, XGBoost, RF, AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting, Bagging and LSTM

All variables (except month of year) retained by all ML algorithms on hourly arrivals. All variables (except time of day, month of year) retained by all ML algorithms and MLR on daily arrivals

Training: 11/2019–08/2020

Test: 09/2020–11/2020

RMSE, MAPE and MAE

Daily Arrivals: SVR was superior with RMSE of 26.84 and MAPE of 8.81%. Hourly Arrivals: LSTM and XGBoost were best performers with RMSEs of 4 and 4.5 and MAPEs of 49% and 44%, respectively

Zhao et al. [49] (2022) /Singapore

ED of the Singapore General Hospital, operating 24/7 / 01/2015–12/2019

Daily arrivals over horizons of 546, 327, 108 and 53 days

Calendar: day of week

Climate: temperature and daily relative humidity

ARIMA, Prophet, CNN, ConvLSTM, BiLSTM, DLSTM, DGRU and DRNN

ML algorithms (CNN, ConvLSTM, BiLSTM, DLSTM, DGRU and DRNN) retained all variables

Training: 70% Test: 30% for 6 months to 5-year-long time series sizes

MAPE, RMSE and MAE

For 1 and 5-year-long time series, DLSTM yielded the best results with MAPE values of 5.67% and 5.72%, and RMSEs values of 25.29 and 24.71, respectively

For 6 months and 3-year-long time series, DRNN yielded the best results with MAPEs values of 5.41% e 5.70%

Gafni-Pappas et al. [50]

(2023) / USA

ED of the St. Joseph Mercy Hospital in Michigan, operating 24/7 /

01/2017–12/2019

Daily arrivals over a 365-day horizon

Calendar: day of week, week of month, month of year

Climate: Daily temperature maximum, precipitation, cloud cover, relative humidity, average pressure, daily change pressure, wet bulb, solar radiation, air quality level, ozone concentration, and percent flu visits

ARIMA, Prophet, ETS, GBM, RF, and Prophet-XGBoost

The day of week, week of month, temperature, average pressure, percent flu visits, retained by all ML algorithms

Training: 01/2017–12/2018

Test: 01/2019–12/2019

fivefold time series cross validation only in training set in ML algorithms

RMSE

RF showed superior performance, with mean value of RMSE of 18.94

Hu et al. [51]

(2023) / USA

ED of a quaternary-care teaching hospital in New York, operating 24/7 / 01/2018–01/2021

Hourly arrivals over 12-h shifts

Calendar: day of week, day versus night, month of year, season, holidays, Recent arrival count 1 and 7-day prior, 30-day moving average,

Climate: temperatures (min, max), precipitation, snow, wind, and hot-weather indicator

LR, SARIMA, SARIMAX, XGBoost, and regression tree (RT)

All variables (except month of year, recent arrival count 1-day prior, temperature max, and hot-weather indicator) in SARIMAX model

Training: 01/2018–01/2019 Test: 02/2019–01/2020 COVID test set: 02/2020–01/2021

tenfold cross validation only in training set in ML algorithms

MAPE and RMSE

SARIMAX showed superior performance, with mean values of MAPE of 8.70% and RMSE of 14.65 for non-COVID test set

Reboredo et al. [52]

(2023) / Spain

ED of a teaching hospital in Santiago, operating 24/7 / 01/2015–12/2020

Daily arrivals over horizons of 1 and 730-days

Calendar: day of week, weekends, season and

past mean values

Poisson regression and INGARCH model

All variables in INGARCH model

Training: 01/2015–12/2018

Test: 01/2019–12/2020

MAE and MSE

INGARCH showed superior performance, with values of MAE of 24.52 and MSE of 979.06 in forecast of 730-days

Rostami-Tabar et al. [53]

(2023) / UK

ED of a hospital, location not disclosed /

04/2014–02/2019

Hourly arrivals over 1 to 48-h horizons

Calendar: hour of day,

day of week, day of year, week of year, holidays, and 24 h lags of holidays and events sporting Climate: temperature

ADAM, Poisson regression, QR, GAM, GAMLSS, Naive, ETS, TBATS, and Prophet, GBM

All variables in ADAM, Poisson regression, QR, and GBM

Training: 04/2014–02/2018

Test: 03/2018–02/2019

RMSE, Quantile Bias, and Pinball score

ADAM showed the best performance, with value of RMSE of 0.0896 in forecast of 48-h

  1. ADAM Augmented Dynamic Adaptive Model, ANN Artificial Neural Networks, ARMA Auto Regressive-Moving Average, ARIMA Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average, ARAMI-ANN Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with Artificial Neural Network, ARAMI-LR Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with Linear Regression, ARAMI-SVR Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with Support Vector Regression, ARIMAX Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with Explanatory Variable AR-NN Autoregressive Neural Network, BiLSTM Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory, CNN Convolutional Neural Networks, CNN-GRU Gated Recurrent Unit with Convolutional Neural Networks, CNN-LSTM Long Short-Term Memory with Convolutional Neural Networks, ConvLSTM Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory, DBN Deep Belief Network, DGRU Deep Stacked Architecture with Gated Recurrent Units, DWT Discrete Wavelet Transform, DNN Deep Neural Networks, EEMD Ensemble Empirical Mode decomposition, ES Exponential Smoothing, ESD Exponential smoothing decomposition, ETS Exponential smoothing state space, EV Explained variance, FTS Fuzzy Time Series, GA-ANN Genetic Algorithm-based ANN, GAMLSS Generalised Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape, GAN-RNN Generative Adversarial Network based on Recurrent Neural Networks, GBM Gradient Boosting Machines, GEE Generalized Estimating Equations, GLM Generalized Linear Model, GLMNET Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent, GAMs Generalised additive models, INGARCH Integer-valued generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic model, HW Holt-Winters, KNN k-Nearest Neighbours, LSTM Long Short-Term Memory, DLSTM Deep Stacked Architecture with Long Short-Term Memory, LR Linear Regression, MAE Mean Absolute Error, MASE Mean Absolute Scaled Error, MAPE Mean Absolute Percentage Error, ME Mean Error, MLP Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network, MLR Multiple Linear Regression, MSARIMA Multivariate Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average, MSE Mean Squared Error, Naïve Naive Forecast, Snaïve Seasonal Naive Method, NN Neural Network, NNAR Neural Network Autoregression, PSO-ANN Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm-based ANN, QR Quantile regression, R2 Coefficient of Determination, RBM Restricted Boltzmann Machines, RNN Recurrent Neural Networks, DRNN Deep Stacked Architecture with Recurrent Neural Network, RNN-1L Recurrent Neural Network with One Layer, RF Random Forest, RMSE Root Mean Square Error, RR Ridge Regression, SARIMA Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average, SARIMAX Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with External Variables, sMAPE symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error, SS Simple Seasonal Exponential Smoothing, STLM Seasonal Decomposition of Time Series by LOESS method, STLM-ETS Seasonal Trend Decomposition using Loess and Exponential Smoothing State Space, StructTS Structural Time Series Model, SVM Support Vector Machine, SVM-RBF Support Vector Machine with Radial Basis Function, SVR Support Vector Regression, TBATS Trigonometric Exponential Smoothing State Space model with Box-Cox Transformation, VAE Variational AutoEncoder algorithm, VAR Vector Autoregression Model, XGBoost eXtreme Gradient Boosting