Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 5 The results of the deployed datasets in this study

From: Application of deep learning in wound size measurement using fingernail as the reference

Nail-size input method

Dataset

PCC1

RMSE2

Manually input nail size

The whole Wound with nail dataset

0.875

8.078

The DFUs3 images

0.979

2.551

The PUs4 images

0.846

11.140

Default nail size (1.09 cm)

The whole Wound with nail dataset

0.759

10.891

The DFUs images

0.875

8.081

The PUs images

0.794

13.112

  1. (1) Pearson Correlation Coefficient (higher cores are better); (2) root mean squared error (lower scores are better), (3) Diabetic foot ulcers, (4) Pressure ulcers
Back to article page

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

ISSN: 1472-6947

Contact us