Skip to main content
Fig. 7 | BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Fig. 7

From: How good is your synthetic data? SynthRO, a dashboard to evaluate and benchmark synthetic tabular data

Fig. 7

Final weighted scores obtained by changing the weights assigned to the different metrics. (a) Case study where a greater weight was assigned to resemblance (0.8) compared to utility (0.15) and privacy (0.05). (b) Similar to the previous case study but with modified weights for single resemblance metrics, prioritizing multivariate ones. (c) Case study where more importance was given to utility (0.7) compared to resemblance (0.2) and privacy (0.1). (d) Case study in which privacy (0.5) and utility (0.4) were prioritized at the expense of resemblance (0.1)

Back to article page

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

ISSN: 1472-6947

Contact us