Development and validation of an instrument to evaluate the perspective of using the electronic health record in a hospital setting

Table 5 Goodness-of-fit statistics for the modified primary-order CFA models

		Absolute Fit				Incremental Fit			Parsimonious Fit
Model	Modification	RMSEA	GFI		AGFI	TLI	CFI	NFI	χ²/df
M1	Initial model	0.06	0.84	0.81		0.89	0.90	0.84	2.38
M2	M1 + removed items with loading < 0.4 (ISQ5; ORG4; ENV1; PC7).	0.06	0.88	0.85		0.92	0.93	0.88	2.17
M3	M2 + correlated errors of CP6 and CP8 (MI = 48.92)	0.05	0.89	0.86		0.93	0.94	0.89	2.01
M4	M3 + correlated errors of ISQ1 and ISQ2 (MI = 20.41)	0.05	0.89	0.87		0.94	0.95	0.90	1.92
M5	M4 + correlated errors of IQ2 and IQ5 (MI = 13.77)	0.05	0.90	0.87		0.94	0.95	0.90	1.87
Criterion for goodness of fit		≤ 0.05	≥ 0.90	≥ 0.85		≥ 0.90	≥ 0.90	≥ 0.90	< 3

Abbreviations: CFI, Comparative Fit Index; TLI, Tucker and Lewis’s Index of fit; NFI, Normed Fit Index; IFI, Incremental Fit Index; RMSEA, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; MI, Modification Index; M, Model; ISQ, IT Service Quality; ORG, Organization; ENV, Environment; IQ, Information Quality; CP, Clinical Performance

ISSN: 1472-6947