Skip to main content

Table 4 Nonparametric test for classification metrics of 7 ML models (Kruskal–Wallis test, M (QL, QU))

From: Classification of coronary artery disease using radial artery pulse wave analysis via machine learning

 

ET

Catboost

RF

LightGBM

GBC

XGBoost

DT

Accuracy

0.8571(0.8285,0.8605)

0.8571(0.8285,0.8605)

0.8372(0.8333,0.8605)

0.8140(0.8048,0.8393)

0.8237(0.7849,0.8343)

0.8237(0.7811,0.8343)

0.7093(0.6154,0.7486)*#â–³

AUC

0.9110(0.8950,0.9315)

0.9010(0.8936,0.9278)

0.9039(0.8955,0.9289)

0.9022(0.8915,0.9273)

0.9063(0.8938,0.9187)

0.9085(0.8908,0.9305)

0.7821(0.7070,0.8149)*#△□◇※

Recall

0.8428(0.8207,0.8550)

0.8428(0.8117,0.8565)

0.8338(0.8281,0.8468)

0.8039(0.7935,0.8274)

0.8120(0.7836,0.8301)

0.8079(0.7742,0.8292)

0.7033(0.5938,0.7434)*#â–³

Prec

0.8618(0.8383,0.8780)

0.8606(0.8312,0.8742)

0.8397(0.8349,0.8721)

0.8212(0.8104,0.8402)

0.8321(0.7899,0.8422)

0.8307(0.7944,0.8422)

0.7095(0.6361,0.7518)*#â–³

F1

0.8559(0.8294,0.8602)

0.8539(0.8281,0.8596)

0.8354(0.8319,0.8603)

0.8121(0.8039,0.8337)

0.8223(0.7855,0.8344)

0.8202(0.7822,0.8348)

0.7073(0.6142,0.7484)*#â–³

Kappa

0.7844(0.7482,0.7905)

0.7843(0.7422,0.7900)

0.7543(0.7489,0.7903)

0.7194(0.7048,0.7576)

0.7346(0.6762,0.7510)

0.7348(0.6705,0.7505)

0.5614(0.4170,0.6221)*#â–³

MCC

0.7910(0.7466,0.7992)

0.7870(0.7438,0.7947)

0.7568(0.7505,0.7956)

0.7239(0.7065,0.7631)

0.7391(0.6777,0.7571)

0.7392(0.6737,0.7571)

0.5630(0.4237,0.6242)*#â–³

  1. Compared with ET model, * significant at p < 0.05; Compared with Catboost model, # significant at p < 0.05; Compared with RF model, △ significant at p < 0.05; Compared with LightGBM model, □ significant at p < 0.05; Compared with GBC model, ◇ significant at p < 0.05; Compared with XGBoost model, ※ significant at p < 0.05