Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison with similar works from the literature

From: Machine learning-based prognostic model for 30-day mortality prediction in Sepsis-3

Authors

Approach

Evaluation

Hou et al. [41]

Logistic regression model, SAPS-II scores prediction model and XGBoost algorithm

Logistic regression (AUC: 0.819), SAPS-II (AUC: 0.797) and XGBoost (AUC: 0.857)

Su et al. [14]

ANN-based architecture

AUC of 0.873

Park et al. [38]

Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, Deep Neural Network (DNN), Super Learner Model

Logistic Regression (AUC: 0.878), Random Forest (AUC: 0.878), XGBoost (AUC: 0.888), DNN (AUC: 0.893), Super Learner Model (AUC: 0.883)

Yang et al. [22]

Logistic Regression Analysis

Training & Validation AUROC of 0.763 and 0.753

Palmowski et al. [75]

SVM with polynomial kernel, ANN

SVM (AUC: 0.84), ANN (AUC: 0.82)

Zhang et al. [65]

XGBoost

AUC: 0.94, F1 score: 0.937

Yong et al. [64]

DGFSD model based on DNN and Graph Convolutional Network (GCN)

Accuracy of 82.78%

Proposed Method

8 Classical Machine Learning Model and Stacking-based Meta Classifier

Extra Tree & Stacked Logistic Regression—AUC 0.99