Table 4 Association between contributing factors and Level of Acceptance and use of EHR
Variable | Level of acceptance of EHR | X2 (p-value) | |
|---|---|---|---|
Satisfactory, n(%) | Unsatisfactory, n(%) | ||
Comfortable using EHR | Â | Â | 11.3(0.001)* |
 Yes | 182(89.7) | 21(10.3) |  |
 No | 21(67.7) | 10(32.3) |  |
Training Source for EHR Usage | Â | Â | 76.8(0.13) |
 IT Officer | 118(58.1) | 10(32.3) |  |
 EHR manager | 77(37.9) | 10(32.3) |  |
 Colleagues at work | 0(0.00) | 11(35.5) |  |
 Was never trained | 8(3.9) | 0(0.00) |  |
Adequacy of EHR Training | Â | 24.3(0.18) | |
 Most adequately | 64(31.5) | 10(32.3) |  |
 Fully adequately | 139(68.5) | 0(0.00) |  |
 Somewhat adequately | 0(0.00) | 21(67.7) |  |
IT Officer Support Post-Training | Â | 31.9(0.001)* | |
 Some support | 76(37.4) | 21(67.7) |  |
 No support | 21(10.3) | 10(32.3) |  |
 Full support | 106(92.0) | 0(0.00) |  |
Wait Time During Network Downtime | Â | 37.8(0.40) | |
 10-20 minutes | 54(26.6) | 10(32.3) |  |
 21-30 minutes | 43(21.2) | 21(67.7) |  |
 <10 minutes | 95(46.8) | 0(0.0) |  |
 >30 minutes | 11(5.4) | 0(0.0) |  |
Discouragement Due to Network Downtime | 13.4(0.001)* | ||
 Sometimes | 85(41.9) | 20(64.5) |  |
 Always | 55(27.1) | 11(35.5) |  |
 Rarely | 63(31.0) | 0(0.0) |  |
Impression of the EHR System | Â | 7.9(0.07) | |
 Very good | 44(21.7) | 0(0.0) |  |
 Good | 159(78.3) | 20(64.5) |  |
 Poor | 0(0.0) | 11(35.5) |  |
Reliability of EHR | Â | Â | 30.7(0.001)* |
 Yes | 193(95.1) | 20(64.5) |  |
 No | 10(4.9) | 11(35.5) |  |
EHR helps reduce patient waiting time | 14.4(0.007)* | ||
 Yes | 182(89.7) | 20(64.5) |  |
 No | 21(10.3) | 11(35.5) |  |
Impact of EHR on Patient Care | Â | Â | 7.5(0.0012)* |
 Yes | 203(100.0) | 20(64.5) |  |
 No | 0(0.00) | 11(35.5) |  |
Impact of EHR on Revenue Generation | Â | Â | 8.5(0.004) * |
 Yes | 75(36.9) | 20(64.5) |  |
 No | 128(63.1) | 11(35.5) |  |