Table 9 Experimental results comparison of existing vs. proposed models
Technique | Specificity% | Accuracy% | Sensitivity% | MCC% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Existing CNN | 85.84 | 89.27 | 89.78 | 81.47 |
Existing CNN-LSTM | 87.37 | 90.17 | 88.98 | 88.35 |
Proposed Hybrid Model | 94.65 | 96.57 | 95.67 | 96.85 |
Technique | Specificity% | Accuracy% | Sensitivity% | MCC% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Existing CNN | 85.84 | 89.27 | 89.78 | 81.47 |
Existing CNN-LSTM | 87.37 | 90.17 | 88.98 | 88.35 |
Proposed Hybrid Model | 94.65 | 96.57 | 95.67 | 96.85 |