Summary of findings: | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Semi-immersive virtual reality compared to conventional therapy for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke | |||||
Setting: The semi-immersive virtual reality interventions were delivered in rehabilitation hospitals, clinics, and some home settings using video capture or robotics to track patient movements and interact with games. The systems provided visual feedback on a display. | |||||
Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects*(95% CI) | № of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | ||
Improvement with conventional therapy | Improvement with semi-immersive VR | ||||
Motor Function | FMA Scale from: -0.4 to 23.05 follow-up: range two weeks to 12 weeks | The mean FMA Improvement was 6.73 points | MD 2.03 points higher (1.8 higher to 2.25 higher) | 344 (12 RCTs) | ⨁◯◯◯ Very Low a, b |
ARAT Scale from: -5.23 to 17.3 follow-up: range two weeks to 3 months | The mean ARAT Improvement was 6.52 points | MD 4.83 points higher (4.53 higher to 5.13 higher) | 256 (5 RCTs) | ⨁◯◯◯ Very low a, b | |
WMFT Scale from: -6.64 to 8.7 follow-up: range from two weeks to 3 months | The mean WMFT Improvement was 0.47 points | MD 3.48 points higher (3.16 higher to 3.79 higher) | 98 (4 RCTs) | ⨁◯◯◯ Very low a, b | |
JTHFT Scale from: 12.36 to 38.4 follow-up: range two weeks to six weeks | The mean JTHFT Improvement was 16.27 seconds | MD 11.94 s lower (10.55 lower to 13.32 lower) | 102 (3 RCTs) | ⨁◯◯◯ Very low a, c | |
Grip Strength Scale from: 0.21 to 12.82 follow-up: range four weeks to 3 months | The mean grip Strength Improvement was 2.65 Kg | MD 1.7 Kg higher (1.3 higher to 2.06 higher) | 137 (4 RCTs) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low a, d | |
Functional Independence Assessment | FIM Scale from: 13.4 to 17.7 follow-up: 3 month | The mean FIM improvement was 16.4 points | MD 0.5 points higher (0.8 lower to 1.9 higher) | 102 (1 RCT) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate a |
BI Scale from: -3.3 to 31.68 follow-up: range two weeks to 12 weeks | The mean BI Improvement was 9.14 points | MD 4.6 points higher (4.09 higher to 5.09 higher) | 169 (4 RCTs) | ⨁◯◯◯ Very low a, b | |
Muscle Spasticity Assessment | MAS Scale from: 0 to 1.5. follow-up: range six weeks to 12 weeks | The mean MAS Improvement was 0.7 points | MD 0.08 points higher (0.8 lower to 0.98 higher) | 57 (2 RCTs) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate a |
Functional Use and dexterity | MAL-AOU Scale from: -0.1 to 0.39 follow-up: range 3 weeks to 12 weeks | The mean MAL-AOU Improvement was 1.02 points | MD 0.18 points higher (0.04 higher to 0.31 higher) | 63 (3 RCTs) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate a |
BBT Scale from: 0 to 34.5 follow-up: range 3 weeks to 10 weeks | The mean BBT Improvement was 10.2 blocks | MD 4.3 blocks higher (3.98 higher to 4.57 higher) | 318 (7 RCTs) | ⨁◯◯◯ Very low a, b |