Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Fig. 2

From: From algorithms to action: improving patient care requires causality

Fig. 2

Illustration of the difference between outcome prediction model accuracy and its value for treatment decision making. Validation of an outcome prediction model following the AJCC checklist leads to a reliable estimate of the outcome prediction model’s accuracy if the treatment policy does not change. However, because the outcome prediction model relies on a fixed historic treatment policy, prediction accuracy does not imply value for decision making, as visualized with the gap. This gap can only be bridged with causality

Back to article page