Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary table of machine learning applied to MTX delayed elimination or Adverse reactions

From: Predicting delayed methotrexate elimination in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients: an innovative web-based machine learning tool developed through a multicenter, retrospective analysis

Title

Authors

Screened Feature

Sample size

Algorithms

AUROC

Risk prediction for delayed clearance of high-dose methotrexate in pediatric hematological malignancies by machine learning [7]

Zhan M

(1) Hematocrit, risk classification, dose, SLC19A1 rs2838958, sex, dose

(2) SLC19A1 rs2838958, dose, sex

205

(1) C5.0 decision tree + SMOTE; (2) Nomogram

(1) AUROC = 0.807

(95% CI 0.724–0.889)

(2) AUROC = 0.690

(95% CI 0.594–0.787)

Predictive analysis of methotrexate elimination delay based on logistic regression model and ROC curve [13]

Wang Yang

SLCO1B1 T521C

82

Logistic

regression

AUROC = 0.751

(0.627–0.875)

Plasma creatinine as predictor of delayed elimination of high-dose methotrexate in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A Danish population-based study [15]

Schmidt, D

(1) Absolute increase in 36 h Plasma Creatinine

(2) Relative increasein 36 h Plasma Creatinine

(3) Infusion plasma MTX concentration

218

Linear

regression

(1) AUROC = 0.930

(95%CI 0.910-0-960)

(2) AUROC = 0.930

(95%CI 0.910-0-960)

(3) AUROC = 0.810

(95%CI 0.750-0-860)

Risk factors for high-dose methotrexate-induced nephrotoxicity [22]

Shinichiro Kawaguchi

Urine pH at day 1

88

Logistic regression

0.750

(95% CI 0.573–0.927)

Predicting Hepatotoxicity Associated with Low-Dose Methotrexate Using Machine Learning [37]

Hu, Qiaozhi

BMI, age, number of drugs and comorbidities, doses of folic acid, antibiotic use, gender, immunosuppressive agents, Glucocorticoid use, First MTX use, Drinking, Type 2 diabetes, Chinese traditional medicine, Dose of folic acid, Infectious liver disease, history of kidney disease

782

(1) XGBoost

(2) AdaBoost

(3) CatBoost

(4) GBDT

(5) LightGBM

(6) TPOT

(7) RF

(8) ANN

(1)0.94

(2)0.69

(3)0.91

(4)0.53

(5)0.87

(6)0.78

(7)0.97

(8)0.65

  1. Abbreviations: SMOTE, Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique; RF: Random Forest; XGBoost: eXtreme gradient boosting; AdaBoost: Adaptive boosting; LightGBM: Light gradient boosting machine; AUROC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CatBoost, Categorical boosting; GBDT, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree; TPOT, Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool; ANN, Artificial Neural Network; BMI, Body Mass Index