Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Fig. 1

From: Comparison of causal forest and regression-based approaches to evaluate treatment effect heterogeneity: an application for type 2 diabetes precision medicine

Fig. 1

Relative feature importance for treatment selection with SGLT2-inhibitor and DPP4-inhibitor treatment, for all clinical features included in model development. a Penalized regression. Feature importance reflects the proportion of chi-squared explained by drug-by-covariate interaction terms for each clinical feature in multivariable analysis, as these represent differential treatment effects for the two therapies. Bars represent bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. b Causal forest model. Adjusted importance (using p-values) represent the covariates selected most often by trees within the causal forest, after controlling for biased variable selection. Permutation-based tests generate p-values for each covariate, using an understanding that spurious splits in trees would continue to occur in the presence of a permuted outcome unless these splits also reflect the true underlying association. For the purpose of comparison, inverse p-values are presented as relative importance measures

Back to article page