Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 1 Sample Descriptive Characteristics (n = 244)

From: 1842676957299765Latent class cluster analysis to understand heterogeneity in prostate cancer treatment utilities

Variable

Mean ± SD or n (%)

Age

60.36 ± 9.5

Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity:

 

   Caucasian

188 (77%)

   African American

50 (20.5%)

   Other

6 (2.5%)

Prostate Cancer:

 

   At-risk

56 (23%)

   Active Disease

188 (77%)

Education: (n = 207)

 

   Less than High School

45 (21.7%)

   More than High School

104 (50.2%)

   Post Graduate

58 (28%)

Income: (n = 182)

 

   ≤ $ 29,000/year

42 (23.1%)

   $ 30,000, < $ 75,000/year

81 (44.5%)

   ≥ $ 75,000/year

59 (32.4%)

Marital Status: (n = 205)

 

   Married/Living with Sig. Other

176 (85.9%)

   Not Married

29 (14.1%)

Job Status: (n = 200)

 

   Working

118 (59%)

   Not Working

82 (41%)

Sex Important: (n = 243)

 

   Very Important

97 (39.9%)

   Somewhat Important

114 (46.9%)

   Unimportant

32 (13.2%)

Ability to Have an Erection: (n = 223)

 

   Usually Able

109 (48.9%)

   Sometimes a Problem

44 (19.7%)

   Usually a Problem

70 (31.4%)

Problems with Urinary Leaking: (n = 242)

 

   Never Have a Problem

179 (74%)

   Sometimes Have a Problem

44 (18.2%)

   Usually a Problem

19 (7.9%)