Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 2 Preferred test choice without and with out-of-pocket costs

From: The effect of offering different numbers of colorectal cancer screening test options in a decision aid: a pilot randomized trial

Test Type

5-Option Version (n = 25)

2-Option Version (n = 37)

 

Without OPC

With OPC*

Without OPC

With OPC**

FOBT

21%

17%

32%

54%

Sigmoidoscopy

4%

8%

-

-

FOBT & Sigmoidoscopy

21%

21%

-

-

Colonoscopy

46%

42%

68%

41%

Barium Enema

4%

8%

-

-

No Screening

4%

4%

-

5%

  1. * Proportion of participants choosing colonoscopy with and without out-of-pocket costs for those viewing the 5-option version (p = 0.31 McNemar's test)
  2. ** Proportion of participants choosing colonoscopy based on out-of-pocket costs for the 2-option version (p = 0.0016)
  3. † Proportion participants selecting colonoscopy between groups without out-of-pocket costs (χ2 p = 0.11)
  4. †† Proportion participants selecting colonoscopy between groups with out-of-pocket costs (χ2 p = 1.00)
Back to article page

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

ISSN: 1472-6947

Contact us