Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 4 Studies of clinical outcomes using interventions of office/hospital-based telemedicine.

From: Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review

Outcomes

Quality Score

Clinical Specialty

Sample

Intervention

Effects

Wootton[37]

II-B

Dermatology

204 patients

Need for special follow-up (RCT)

No difference in need for follow-up

Brennan[36]

I-A

Emergency Medicine

100 patients

Patients randomized to local or telemedicine care (RCT)

No difference in ER return or need for additional care

Rosenfeld[38]

II-B

Intensive Care

201 patients

Addition of remote intensivist to surgical ICU

Decreases in severity-adjusted ICU mortality (46–68%) and hospital mortality (30–33%). Decreases in ICU complications (44–50%) and ICU length of stay (30–34%).

Rendina[39]

II-B

Neonatology

314 patients

Length of stay in NICU for telemedicine vs. no telemedicine

Length of stay decreased significantly related to birth weight

Goh[40]

III-B

Neurosurgery

116 patients

Neurosurgery transfer before and after teleradiology

Fewer adverse events during transfer (8% vs. 32%)

Goh[41]

III-B

Neurosurgery

63 patients

Head injury patients with teleradiology

Fewer adverse events during transfer (6.4% vs. 32.1%)